At the beginning of the work of this Specific Instance, I presented some documents to NCP Brazil containing almost a hundred “web links” to access documents that made “full proof” of my allegations, as follows:
a) Initial Submission (Doc. 01): presented to NCP Brazil on July 16, 2020. Note that in this document has been attached the “Doc. 32” containing the “(expanded) chronology of the facts” (Doc. 02) with the purpose of “reconstructing the events” referring to the “actions” and “omissions” of Eni to my disfavor to prove the non-compliance with the OECD Guidelines;
b) Complementary Submission 01 (Doc. 03): Soon after the Initial Submission, NCP Brazil requested additional information;
c) Complementary Submission 02 (Doc. 04): As soon as Petrobras, the successor of the Brazilian assets of Eni since 2004, by determination of the Ministry of Transparency and General Controllership of the Union (CGU), due to the legal precepts of LAI (Law for Access to Information), gave me access (in November/2020) to several documents produced in 2001 and 2002, both by Eni's Brazilian subsidiary and by Eni itself, I sent to the NCP Brazil a new complementary submission on the said documents;
d) Reply to the Rapporteur (Doc. 05): After Eni's manifestation about my complaint to the NCP Brazil, the rapporteur of this Specific Instance made some questions that were answered within the established deadline.
No comments:
Post a Comment