Translation of the Submitter's statements

According to an email from the Executive Secretariat of the NCP Brazil (Doc. 01), dated September 2, 2022, in response to my inquiries, it was informed that:

a) Eni received a translated version of the “initial submission” into English (Doc. 02);

b) Eni received, together with the English version, the original in Portuguese of the allegations (Initial Submission), with the information that all attached files were made available therein. Thus, it received the document 32 in the original (in Portuguese), as provided by the Submitter;

c) The additional information was used for the treatment of the Specific Instance by the NCP and was not made available to Eni.

Note that Eni did not receive from the NCP Brazil all of my manifestations in the English language, nor the "Doc. 32" — mentioned above — containing the “(expanded) chronology of the facts” (Doc. 03).

Also note that the non-receipt of all my manifestations reported to NCP Brazil cannot serve as a “justification” for Eni, since the company is fully aware of all the facts (and proofs) that are part of my allegations of their non-compliance with the OECD Guidelines. And that's because, over all these years, Eni was insistently contacted by me.

It is also important to emphasize that the “(synthetic) chronology of the facts” (Doc. 04), from now on called “chronology of facts”, for the “reconstruction of events” involving “actions” and “omissions” of Eni to my disadvantage, containing the "new documents" — which I received from Petrobras — were included in the "Proposal for Amicable Settlement" (Doc. 05).

This proposal was indisputably requested by Eni itself through the greatest Italian authority in Brazilian territory, the ambassador of Italy in Brazil, when I spoke with this diplomat at the end of November 2020.